- #COMPARE GUAKE TERMINAL VS HYPER TERMINAL INSTALL#
- #COMPARE GUAKE TERMINAL VS HYPER TERMINAL FULL#
- #COMPARE GUAKE TERMINAL VS HYPER TERMINAL SOFTWARE#
- #COMPARE GUAKE TERMINAL VS HYPER TERMINAL WINDOWS 7#
External 8.04 and 7.41 (2 test) and internal was 8.06. Here are the results:Ī) On the Epicor server itself, average time was 10.68 second, the highest but I suspect this is due to doing the server side work as well as displaying.ī) The terminal server, whether external or internal seems to be generating relatively equal results. All servers in use have been rebooted and testing done after hours when no other users are on the TS. Epicor is logged in as the same account as is the terminal server Stopwatch was stopped when the main menu window loses focus, no matter how long the second window takes to appear (more on this later). Is ignored while #2-4 are averaged for results. The first time it is loaded takes longer than subsequent loads so the first load I took a custom form load from the main menu of Epicor as it was taking a fair amount of time to load up the window. Sorry for the delay but I was able to do some testing to get some actual results.ġ. This assumes that your analysis of the issue points to a networking problem. If necessary you may need to do a network capture at various points and take a look at what is actually occurring on the network. For example, all the internal users could be connecting to the LAN via WiFi, and that could result in the internal users having a poor experience versus the external. Just a common difference I wanted to mention, it may or may not apply in this case. RD Gateway or VPN being used for external users is As to question regarding the network configuration, I'm asking you to walk through, step-by-step, how a client communicates with the server internally versus externally, and map out differences.
#COMPARE GUAKE TERMINAL VS HYPER TERMINAL FULL#
Are the users launching the applications (Epicor ERP, etc.) as published RemoteApps, or are they using a full desktop RDP session and running them within it, or both?ģ. For example, if you enter text rapidly does from internal client does the characters appearing on the screen lag behind?Ģ.
![compare guake terminal vs hyper terminal compare guake terminal vs hyper terminal](https://www.saashub.com/images/app/screenshots/19/bfbd9913084f/landing-medium.jpg)
To simply, please test using Notepad from external and internal, and describe the differences you see. What precisely is slower when comparing the internal vs.
#COMPARE GUAKE TERMINAL VS HYPER TERMINAL SOFTWARE#
You mention the Epicor ERP software in terms of speed difference. Since the RDSH is Server 2008 R2, you are only using TCP.ġ. Users RDP to the external IP address and get routed via the firewall to the appropriate IP of the TS. I've mapped out the entire network infrastructure and will be mapping it in Visio as I see it being potentially helpful for others to assist in resolving.
#COMPARE GUAKE TERMINAL VS HYPER TERMINAL INSTALL#
Whatever stock install of 2008 R2 TS would be. RDP client version is It should be noted that there are a few users with laptops that state that their connection is much faster when they work from home so I don't believe RDP verison is the problem.
#COMPARE GUAKE TERMINAL VS HYPER TERMINAL WINDOWS 7#
Client devices are Windows 7 Professional.The client program resides on the TS, and there are two servers related, ERP which hosts the server software and ERPSQL which is used for it's The biggest speed difference that we have seen is when using the Epicor ERP software installed on the TS.Yours has given me lots to think about and research.
![compare guake terminal vs hyper terminal compare guake terminal vs hyper terminal](https://i1.wp.com/itsfoss.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/best-terminal-emulators.png)
I rarely post on forums but this one has got my brain twisted. Please let me know where I should look and if you require any further information. Higher priority to resources, but I wouldn't even know how that would be set up and I built the RDS server. My biggest confusion comes from the fact that internal and external users are hitting the same RDS server, so the experience should be the same, if not the external users being a little slower due to the distance. 1 virtual host, 2 processors, 128GB RAM, SAN Not that it should matter, but here are the details on the rest of the network: The local response times are not unworkably slow, they are slow enough that now seeing how fast an external user can use the RDS server, they want it fixed. All clients are experiencing the slower response time (thus why it wasn't identified until screen sharing a distantly remote user).
![compare guake terminal vs hyper terminal compare guake terminal vs hyper terminal](https://beyondlocalhost.tech/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/QuakeOpenFileSettings.png)
This is very confusing to me given that the local network should have the fastest connection to the server. Even with the double trip, the responsiveness of the consultant's RDS session was blazing fast compared to local clients on the network. When working with a consultant, who is at least 3000 miles away, they connected to the consultant via a screen share application (Teamviewer, WebCentral, etc) and the consultant then My client is experiencing slow performance to their Terminal Server.